Tatars hair: texture and color in 63 observed portraits
Tatars: hair texture straight in 78% of 63; hair color black in 42% of 66.
Catalog portraits for Tatars are AI-generated adult subjects; the measurements on this page come from documented photographs of real people, not from these images.
Hair texture
n = 63 assessable · 7 not assessableAndre Walker hair-texture classification covering the spectrum from straight (Type 1) to coily (Type 4), with subdivisions A-C within each numbered type.
| Value | Share | n | |
|---|---|---|---|
| straightStraight with medium body. | 78% | 49 | |
| wavyDefined S-waves; medium texture. | 21% | 13 | |
| curlyTighter, springy curls; corkscrew shape. | 2% | 1 |
Vocabulary: Hair texture (Andre Walker) (andre_walker_1990s)
Hair color
n = 66 assessable · 4 not assessablePredominant natural hair color, where determinable. Visibly dyed hair should be flagged via grooming-state metadata.
| Value | Share | n | |
|---|---|---|---|
| blackVery dark hair appearing black under normal lighting; high eumelanin. | 42% | 28 | |
| dark brownDistinctly brown but darker than medium-brown. | 5% | 3 | |
| light/medium brownLight-brown to caramel range. | 3% | 2 | |
| blondeStandard blonde. | 11% | 7 | |
| red/auburnRed, auburn, or copper. High pheomelanin; correlated with MC1R variants. | 6% | 4 | |
| gray/whiteVisibly graying hair, mixed pigmented and unpigmented. | 33% | 22 |
Vocabulary: Hair color (hair_color_qualitative)
Where these numbers come from
70 publicly documented portraits of notable Tatars people were assessed by a vision model against the catalog vocabulary, one row per portrait. Values are what the photographs show, read by a model, not population measurements. Each table counts only portraits where the value could be assessed; covered, obscured and unclear portraits are reported separately.
Notable-people corpora skew older, so hair color over-represents gray and white, and image quality varies. Treat shares as a description of this sample. Mean model confidence for this family: 0.73. 61% of portraits are high quality.
The same rows are published as image_observations in the catalog dataset; see the methodology. A family page exists only when at least 10 portraits carry an assessable value.