Mandinka face shape: proportions, cheekbones and jaw in 66 observed portraits

Mandinka: overall face shape Oblong / long in 55% of 66; cheekbone (zygomatic) prominence Moderate in 94% of 67; cheekbone width (bizygomatic breadth) Balanced in 64% of 66; midface morphology Balanced in 66% of 65; forehead shape (sagittal) Rounded / convex in 88% of 64; jaw width (bigonial) Narrow (tapered) in 45% of 66; mandibular angle (gonial angle) Moderate in 54% of 67; chin shape (frontal) Rounded in 97% of 66; chin projection (sagittal) Balanced in 99% of 67.

  • Mandinka catalog portrait, AI-generated, face shape in view

Catalog portraits for Mandinka are AI-generated adult subjects; the measurements on this page come from documented photographs of real people, not from these images.

Overall face shape

n = 66 assessable

Macro-level shape of the face derived from facial outline (forehead width, cheekbone width, jaw width, face length).

ValueSharen
Oblong / longLength substantially greater than width; balanced forehead and jaw.55%36
RoundLength and width approximately equal; soft jaw and forehead curves.30%20
OvalLength approximately 1.5x width; balanced forehead and jaw with widest point at cheekbones.11%7
SquareLength and width approximately equal; angular jaw and forehead.5%3

Vocabulary: Overall face shape (face_shape_qualitative)

Cheekbone (zygomatic) prominence

n = 67 assessable

Anterior projection of the zygomatic prominence.

ValueSharen
ModerateCheekbones visible but not prominent.94%63
High / prominentPronounced anterior projection; defined cheekbone landmarks. Common in some East Asian, indigenous American, and Slavic populations.6%4

Vocabulary: Cheekbone (zygomatic) prominence (zygomatic_prominence_qualitative)

Cheekbone width (bizygomatic breadth)

n = 66 assessable

Width of the face at the cheekbones, proportional to face height.

ValueSharen
BalancedBizygomatic breadth in proportional reference range.64%42
WideBizygomatic breadth substantially wide; common in East Asian and indigenous populations.36%24

Vocabulary: Cheekbone width (bizygomatic breadth) (bizygomatic_breadth_qualitative)

Midface morphology

n = 65 assessable

Soft-tissue contour of the midface (the region between the lower eyelid and the upper lip).

ValueSharen
BalancedAverage midface fullness.66%43
Full / youthfulAnterior midface fullness; smooth nasolabial fold; defined cheek apple.32%21
Flattened / agedReduced midface fullness; deepened nasolabial fold; visible tear-trough; mid-cheek descent.2%1

Vocabulary: Midface morphology (midface_qualitative)

Forehead shape (sagittal)

n = 64 assessable

Profile shape of the forehead in lateral view.

ValueSharen
Rounded / convexSmoothly rounded forehead profile; soft slope.88%56
Flat / verticalForehead nearly vertical in profile; minimal anterior curvature.13%8

Vocabulary: Forehead shape (sagittal) (forehead_shape_qualitative)

Jaw width (bigonial)

n = 66 assessable

Width of the lower jaw at the gonial angles (bigonial breadth) relative to the cheekbones (bizygomatic breadth).

ValueSharen
Narrow (tapered)Bigonial breadth substantially less than bizygomatic; tapered lower face.45%30
BalancedBigonial breadth approximately 75-85% of bizygomatic; aesthetic reference range.17%11
WideBigonial breadth approaches or exceeds bizygomatic; squared or wider-than-cheekbones lower face. Common in East Asian populations.38%25

Vocabulary: Jaw width (bigonial) (bigonial_breadth_qualitative)

Mandibular angle (gonial angle)

n = 67 assessable

Sharpness of the gonial angle.

ValueSharen
ModerateStandard 120-130° angle; defined but rounded gonial transition.54%36
Soft / obtuseSmooth, rounded transition with no distinct angle. More common in female physiognomy and with subcutaneous fat coverage.43%29
Sharp / angularVisible 90°-leaning angle at the gonial point; defined jawline. More common in male physiognomy and in East Asian populations.3%2

Vocabulary: Mandibular angle (gonial angle) (gonial_angle_qualitative)

Chin shape (frontal)

n = 66 assessable

Shape of the chin in frontal view.

ValueSharen
RoundedSmooth U-shape; no distinct point or angle.97%64
SquareWide, flat chin with sharp lateral angles.3%2

Vocabulary: Chin shape (frontal) (chin_shape_qualitative)

Chin projection (sagittal)

n = 67 assessable

Anterior projection of the chin (pogonion) in lateral view.

ValueSharen
Retrognathic / recessedPogonion sits posterior to the Riedel reference plane; receding chin.1%1
BalancedPogonion approximately at the Riedel reference plane.99%66

Vocabulary: Chin projection (sagittal) (riedel_pogonion_qualitative)

Where these numbers come from

67 publicly documented portraits of notable Mandinka people were assessed by a vision model against the full 22-vocabulary schema, one value per dimension. Values are what the photographs show, read by a model, not population measurements. Each table counts only portraits where the value could be assessed; covered, obscured and unclear portraits are reported separately.

Notable-people corpora skew older, so hair color over-represents gray and white, and image quality varies. Treat shares as a description of this sample.

These rows are not yet in the published catalog dataset, which currently carries the earlier single-row analysis; see the methodology. A family page exists only when at least 10 portraits carry an assessable value.