Hmong eyes: iris color, shape and epicanthic fold in 20 observed portraits

Hmong: iris color Very dark brown / black-appearing in 53% of 17; eye shape Almond in 65% of 20; upper eyelid crease type Single eyelid (monolid, no crease) in 70% of 20; epicanthic fold Tarsalis in 100% of 20; palpebral fissure slant Slight upslant in 100% of 20; eyebrow shape Soft arch in 57% of 21.

  • Hmong catalog portrait, AI-generated, eyes in view

Catalog portraits for Hmong are AI-generated adult subjects; the measurements on this page come from documented photographs of real people, not from these images.

Iris color

n = 17 assessable · 5 not assessable

Predominant color of the iris. Heterochromia is captured as its own value; mixed colors (e.g. hazel, blue-green) get distinct buckets.

ValueSharen
Very dark brown / black-appearingIris appears nearly black under typical lighting; high melanin content. Common in East Asian, South Asian, Sub-Saharan African, and indigenous populations.53%9
dark brown35%6
BrownMedium to dark brown iris; visible iris detail.12%2

Vocabulary: Iris color (iris_color_qualitative)

Eye shape

n = 20 assessable

Overall shape of the visible eye, considering the silhouette of the upper and lower lid margins together. Independent dimension from eyelid_crease_type and epicanthic_fold, which capture finer morphological variation.

ValueSharen
AlmondSlightly elongated horizontal axis; mild taper at lateral and medial canthi. Considered the aesthetic reference shape.65%13
Monolid (no visible crease)Smooth upper lid with no visible supratarsal crease. Common in East Asian populations; associated with single eyelid morphology.25%5
HoodedUpper lid skin descends over the lid crease, partially or fully covering the upper lid platform. Often associated with periorbital aging but can be constitutional.10%2

Vocabulary: Eye shape (eye_shape_qualitative)

Upper eyelid crease type

n = 20 assessable

Morphology of the upper eyelid supratarsal crease. The single most ethnically-variant periocular dimension. The Asian-ophthalmology / Asian-blepharoplasty literature provides the canonical classification system, distinguishing several functional and aesthetic patterns.

ValueSharen
Single eyelid (monolid, no crease)No visible supratarsal crease; smooth upper lid skin. Approximately 50% of East Asian populations.70%14
Double, low (~3-5mm above lash line)Crease present but sits low on the lid, close to the lash line. Common in East Asian populations with double lids.30%6

Vocabulary: Upper eyelid crease type (mccurdy_chen_eyelid_crease)

Epicanthic fold

n = 20 assessable

Presence and morphology of the epicanthic fold — the skin fold of the upper eyelid that may cover the medial canthus. Significant ethnic variation; high prevalence in East Asian, Central Asian, and indigenous American populations.

ValueSharen
TarsalisFold begins at the upper lid skin and inserts on the lower lid, covering the medial canthus. The most common epicanthic-fold variant in East Asian populations.100%20

Vocabulary: Epicanthic fold (duke_elder_epicanthus_classification)

Palpebral fissure slant

n = 20 assessable

Angle of the palpebral fissure axis (line from medial to lateral canthus) relative to horizontal. Significant ethnic variation; East Asian populations average steeper upslant than European populations.

ValueSharen
Slight upslantLateral canthus slightly higher than medial; ~5-10° above horizontal. Within the European aesthetic reference range.100%20

Vocabulary: Palpebral fissure slant (fissure_axis_qualitative)

Eyebrow shape

n = 21 assessable

Overall arch and shape of the eyebrow as visible in the photograph.

ValueSharen
Soft archGentle, gradual arch; arch peak in the lateral two-thirds.57%12
StraightMinimal arch; nearly horizontal brow line.38%8
Flat / descendingNo arch; brow descends laterally toward the temple.5%1

Vocabulary: Eyebrow shape (eyebrow_shape_qualitative)

Where these numbers come from

22 publicly documented portraits of notable Hmong people were assessed by a vision model against the full 22-vocabulary schema, one value per dimension. Values are what the photographs show, read by a model, not population measurements. Each table counts only portraits where the value could be assessed; covered, obscured and unclear portraits are reported separately.

Notable-people corpora skew older, so hair color over-represents gray and white, and image quality varies. Treat shares as a description of this sample.

These rows are not yet in the published catalog dataset, which currently carries the earlier single-row analysis; see the methodology. A family page exists only when at least 10 portraits carry an assessable value.