Circassians eyes: iris color, shape and epicanthic fold in 48 observed portraits

Circassians: iris color Brown in 53% of 17; eye shape Almond in 73% of 48; upper eyelid crease type Double, medium (~6-9mm) in 95% of 39; epicanthic fold Absent in 100% of 46; palpebral fissure slant Horizontal in 54% of 48; eyebrow shape Soft arch in 78% of 51.

Catalog portraits for Circassians are AI-generated adult subjects; the measurements on this page come from documented photographs of real people, not from these images.

Iris color

n = 17 assessable · 35 not assessable

Predominant color of the iris. Heterochromia is captured as its own value; mixed colors (e.g. hazel, blue-green) get distinct buckets.

Value	Share	n
BrownMedium to dark brown iris; visible iris detail.	53%	9
dark brown	29%	5
HazelMixed brown and green/gold; central iris differs in color from peripheral iris (central heterochromia).	6%	1
BlueTrue blue; highest frequency in Northern European populations, decreases southward.	6%	1
Blue-greenMixed blue and green with neither dominant.	6%	1

Vocabulary: Iris color (iris_color_qualitative)

Eye shape

n = 48 assessable

Overall shape of the visible eye, considering the silhouette of the upper and lower lid margins together. Independent dimension from eyelid_crease_type and epicanthic_fold, which capture finer morphological variation.

Value	Share	n
AlmondSlightly elongated horizontal axis; mild taper at lateral and medial canthi. Considered the aesthetic reference shape.	73%	35
Deep-setEye sits deep within the orbital socket; pronounced shadow above the upper lid. Brow ridge typically prominent.	23%	11
RoundVertical and horizontal axes approximately equal; minimal canthal taper. Visible sclera above and below the iris.	2%	1
HoodedUpper lid skin descends over the lid crease, partially or fully covering the upper lid platform. Often associated with periorbital aging but can be constitutional.	2%	1

Vocabulary: Eye shape (eye_shape_qualitative)

Upper eyelid crease type

n = 39 assessable

Morphology of the upper eyelid supratarsal crease. The single most ethnically-variant periocular dimension. The Asian-ophthalmology / Asian-blepharoplasty literature provides the canonical classification system, distinguishing several functional and aesthetic patterns.

Value	Share	n
Double, medium (~6-9mm)Mid-position crease; common reference range for European-population eyelids.	95%	37
Double, low (~3-5mm above lash line)Crease present but sits low on the lid, close to the lash line. Common in East Asian populations with double lids.	5%	2

Vocabulary: Upper eyelid crease type (mccurdy_chen_eyelid_crease)

Epicanthic fold

n = 46 assessable

Presence and morphology of the epicanthic fold — the skin fold of the upper eyelid that may cover the medial canthus. Significant ethnic variation; high prevalence in East Asian, Central Asian, and indigenous American populations.

Value	Share	n
AbsentNo epicanthic fold; medial canthus clearly visible.	100%	46

Vocabulary: Epicanthic fold (duke_elder_epicanthus_classification)

Palpebral fissure slant

n = 48 assessable

Angle of the palpebral fissure axis (line from medial to lateral canthus) relative to horizontal. Significant ethnic variation; East Asian populations average steeper upslant than European populations.

Value	Share	n
HorizontalLateral canthus at the same level as medial canthus; axis approximately 0°.	54%	26
Slight downslantLateral canthus slightly below medial; visible fatigue or aging appearance.	33%	16
Slight upslantLateral canthus slightly higher than medial; ~5-10° above horizontal. Within the European aesthetic reference range.	13%	6

Vocabulary: Palpebral fissure slant (fissure_axis_qualitative)

Eyebrow shape

n = 51 assessable

Overall arch and shape of the eyebrow as visible in the photograph.

Value	Share	n
Soft archGentle, gradual arch; arch peak in the lateral two-thirds.	78%	40
StraightMinimal arch; nearly horizontal brow line.	16%	8
Flat / descendingNo arch; brow descends laterally toward the temple.	6%	3

Vocabulary: Eyebrow shape (eyebrow_shape_qualitative)

Where these numbers come from

52 publicly documented portraits of notable Circassians people were assessed by a vision model against the full 22-vocabulary schema, one value per dimension. Values are what the photographs show, read by a model, not population measurements. Each table counts only portraits where the value could be assessed; covered, obscured and unclear portraits are reported separately.

Notable-people corpora skew older, so hair color over-represents gray and white, and image quality varies. Treat shares as a description of this sample.

These rows are not yet in the published catalog dataset, which currently carries the earlier single-row analysis; see the methodology. A family page exists only when at least 10 portraits carry an assessable value.